I started the session at k client..
Second question itself the way she answered …she described the event …it made it clear that she was visual..
6 Likes
Thank you for helping me understand…this will.he be so helpful..
7 Likes
Well ..primary dominant was visual…
When taking up session… She was super fast to explain the event clearly …
7 Likes
That’s perfect! You did improvise and that’s a pretty good quality 
6 Likes
You are most welcome 
happy to help with lil knowledge I gained along the way
6 Likes
Ok, dear 
… 
That’s what i was confused about.
7 Likes
Wow Dr Gayatri that was a very well conducted and beautfully captured session. i personally loved reading the whole writeup. there may be ups and downs but thats the way we learn right. All the best.
8 Likes
Hi Gaytri, did a wonderful 
job, i felt bit of jumping in to the events.
7 Likes
A deeply intense and courageous case @Dr. Gayathri…..I sensed, you could actually feel Sneha’s pain layered across lifetimes.
The balance you kept in pacing and marking your presence, especially during the assault scenes…not rushing Sneha out of emotion, also not letting her drown in it… is not easy and you handled it with a lot of sensitivity.
The affect bridge to the past life is very clean and the way the same pattern of violation echoed from childhood into that lifetime gave a powerful insight into her “hurt” theme.
Also, the Panjurli intervention felt very organic…not forced…and beautifully aligned with her belief system.
These moments often become the true anchors of healing.
Bringing in forgiveness + womb healing together, especially considering her PCOD history is highly commendable.
This integration was important.
Only one small reflection…
during such high-intensity trauma releases, sometimes a bit more grounding or resourcing before and after the scene can make the integration even safer and deeper.
Overall, a very heartfelt piece of work..… you held the story with compassion and this itself is healing.
8 Likes
Dr. Nidhi, this is actually a very valid observation….. and I’m glad you brought it up
Yes, by pure scoring 4/6/4, Sneha is clearly auditory dominant…no doubt about that.
I think “kinesthetic” mention might have come from is what we witnessed during the session, her strong emotional releases, body responses (crying, sweating, breathlessness)..… these moments can make it look like the client is kinesthetic.
But actually, there’s a small nuance here…she is processing through auditory (guidance, reassurance, therapist’s voice), and then expressing/releasing through the body (kinesthetic).
So in my understanding she iss not primarily kinesthetic in modality..… but her trauma is stored and releasing somatically.
It’s one of those cases where modality is not equal to expression
And honestly, Dr. Gayathri did tap into her auditory side well…every time she grounded her with voice, Sneha could stay with the process.
Beautiful point you raised… these little distinctions really deepen our understanding as therapists
9 Likes
This is actually very honest and practical @Harmeet..… as it reflects what we all experience in real sessions
Yes, technically by training, if the K score is above 3, we treat the client carefully as kinesthetic because K clients tend to feel deeply and react strongly in the body, especially during trance.
So we as therapists become a little more gentle, paced and cautious while guiding them.
But at the same time, the scores are just an entry point, not the full reality.
In Sneha’s case
On paper…A is highest (6), so she is auditory dominant
But in the session …her body/emotional responses (crying, fear, sweating) were very intense
So even if someone is auditory, if their K score is 4, their emotional-body sensitivity is high
So as therapists, we need to handle them with the care we would give a kinesthetic client
It’s not about labeling her strictly as “K” or “A” It’s more about understanding that
She enters through auditory ( voice, reassurance)
But she releases through kinesthetic (body, emotions)
And this is why this case felt “intense” and “sensitive”
N yes, sometimes clients may not score perfectly and the trance itself reveals the truth more than the form
So the wisdom here is…
Use the scores to begin….. but trust the client’s response to guide you.
And, in Sneha’s case, this is exactly what was needed…a blend of auditory guidance with kinesthetic sensitivity .
7 Likes
Thank you, Supritee, for such a wonderful explanation. I love to read the comment always after reading the case; this is best part, I feel, and loads of learning here with clear cut defined vision.
8 Likes
Definitely, it worked for me, Harmeet. Thanks for the writeup and the time u are giving to help us; it’s adorable.
8 Likes
Wonderful craft, Dr. @gayathripadiyar7, Loved the flawless sessions you have conducted. Damn cool, year. Keep it up. I am so proud of you. 
8 Likes
so beautiful aspect of PLRT folded_hands:folded_hands: no words at all
8 Likes
I heard the “deva panjurli” in the “Kantara” movie; the climax was like magnanimous to explain the real meaning of “deva.” It’s not at all possible to portray it in such a magical way on screen, rishab has blessing so that he was able to do so 
8 Likes
so beautifully released the stress and make client relax
8 Likes
this is what i miss when I practice. I will sure follow from next time
8 Likes
Happy moment achevied
8 Likes
Perfectly explained this is how the approach should be.
7 Likes