Working with Grief Through Early Childhood Imprints

A client, Kimi (name changed), came to me carrying a lot of grief. She had lost both her parents two years ago and was still unable to cope with the loss. This was her main concern when she came in. As we went deeper, she shared how overwhelmed she felt, how disorganised her life had become. She said she was unable to do things for her child and struggled to keep her house tidy. Everything felt too much.

When I meet a client, my first focus is always their words. I listened to her and allowed her to speak freely, from her heart. Although she came in speaking about the loss of both parents, as the sessions unfolded it became clear that her grief was much deeper around her father than her mother. She loved both her parents, but the pain connected to her father was more intense.

There was also another layer of deep emotional pain connected to her relationship with her sibling. Her sibling’s spouse does not allow Kimi to stay in touch with them, leading to a strained and painful relationship. Despite this, Kimi felt responsible. When I enquired further, she shared that as the elder daughter she believed it was her duty to take care of her sibling, even when there was no contact. This belief kept her trapped in guilt, creating a repeating emotional loop.

During the session, Kimi went back to an early childhood memory. She recalled hearing someone say that her father did not come to see her immediately after her birth because she was a girl child. Her father actually came a few days later, but Kimi does not know whether what she heard was fact or not. What mattered was that the little child internalised it deeply.

This is how trauma works, it enters quietly and begins shaping an entire life.

Kimi developed a deep subconscious belief that she was “not enough” because she was a girl. From there, she learned to live life by trying to impress her father. In reality, her father never told her she was not enough. But hearing a relative say that at such a tender age created a lasting imprint. Her father was a perfectionist, and Kimi learned that being perfect was the way to be seen.

Papa, see I am just like you.
Papa, see I do everything well.
Papa, see I never say no.
Papa, see I always listen.
Papa, see I plan everything properly.

This became her way of surviving and belonging.

Now we see adult Kimi, close to 40 years old. She cannot say no at work because she never learned how. She works extra hours, overextends herself, and then comes home realising she has not spent time with her child. Immediately the familiar voice arises: I am not enough.

She looks around her home and notices a messy corner (something present in every home) but her inner voice says, You are not enough*.* Your house is messy. What began as a childhood belief has now spread into every area of her life. And now, even her body is carrying the weight.

The little child within her also felt responsible for her sibling, believing it was her job to keep everything perfect and intact.

When we come to the loss of her father, there are two parts grieving. One is the adult self who lost a father figure. The other is the little child who lost her entire world. She lost her papa, the one she was constantly trying to impress, the one she was learning to be perfect for. When he was gone, the child did not know where to go or who to show her perfection to.

This made her grief immeasurable. She could not cope because the loss was not just of a parent, it was the loss of her identity and purpose as a child.

Through reparenting the inner child and dissipating the stored emotional energy, something shifted.

Today, Kimi has found her voice. She says no when she wants to. She has found balance in her relationship with her sibling. She still loves them deeply, but she no longer feels responsible for holding the family together. She is a more present and content mother, finding happiness in small, everyday moments with her child. The weight of the grief has come down.

10 Likes

@ramyaa This is a very nice summarized version of an aspect of your clent’s issue.It clearly throws light on how a therapist should analyze a client’s issue with sensitivity from multiple angles…its all about connecting the dots.

4 Likes

@ramyaa
Beautifully explained!! Making parents happy is the first thing we do as kids, we learn if we behave certain way, achieve academic success or play certain sports etc we make our parents happy and love becomes something we EARN, not something we simply receive. And over times it becomes a pattern. We simply do things not to disappoint em and silencing our own needs. We feel responsible for their emotions and we measure our worth by their approval. In all this kids don’t try to be good they simply try to be SAFE. And this carries on into adulthood relationships as well, they become people pleaser, and feel guilty over choosing themselves. They confuse love with responsibility and become over functioning in relationships. A child’s job is not to make their parents happy. Its parent’s job to make kids safe enough to be themselves. Healing happens when we learn it’s not selfish to choose ourselves and how to grow out of survival mode.

4 Likes

Really happy for your client that she is knows her boundaries and able to handle her family and relationship in a better way
Thanks for sharing Ramya

5 Likes

This is beautiful @ramyaa :heart:

6 Likes

Yeah…agreeing completely

3 Likes

Yes, this shift into healthy boundary is often the real marker of healing …not that relationships change overnight, but that the person’s way of relating changes.

4 Likes

@Harmeet,
beautifully put.. children aren’t trying to be good, they’re trying to be safe
It captures the emotional logic behind so many adult patterns.
And later in life we don’t even realise we are still negotiating for emotional safety in every relationship.

I appreciated how you differentiated love from responsibility. Many clients don’t feel unloved, they feel responsible for being loved.
This subtle shift is what keeps the guilt alive whenever we choose ourselves.

And yes, healing often begins the moment we understand that self-honouring is not rejection of others…it is the end of a very old role we play too early.

Very thoughtful…

4 Likes

@Dr. Sarandha,

I really liked how simply you captured the essence of the work.

Your saying highlights an important reminder for therapists…that technique matters, but perception matters more.
The ability to hold multiple angles at once… behaviour, belief, memory, emotion and meaning is what transforms a session from problem-solving into true resolution.

Appreciate you pointing that out so succinctly

5 Likes

Ramya, really loved reading…

What amazed me is how the presenting issue is grief… but the real wound was identity.
So often clients come saying they can’t move on and on the surface it looks like attachment, but here you beautifully showed that your client was not only grieving her father, but grieving the role she had built her entire self around.

I could feel how every adult behaviour made sense once the belief
“I am not enough because I am a girl” surfaced
Your explanation of the two grieving parts, the adult and the inner child is very powerful. Many people try to console the adult mind, but the child part is the one frozen in time. Until that child finds safety, grief keeps looping.
What I also appreciate is that you didn’t make the father a villain. You kept the focus on the child’s interpretation, which is clinically a mature work.
Healing doesn’t come from changing the past, it comes from changing the meaning stored inside it.
By helping her release responsibility and re-parenting herself you removed burden. That is why the outcome is so authentic.

Beautifully handled case.
It is a great reminder that many long-standing adult struggles are not behavioural problems… they are unfinished childhood negotiations with love.

6 Likes

Yes I agree with you

4 Likes

@kobrakulsh Thank you Supritee for such kind words. These are old repeated societal norms and people don’t see any issues with it, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing. I see change everywhere now, it’s very slow, subtle, and pleasant! We will get there! We are the change, treating and teaching our kids differently than our parents did.

4 Likes

So well said @hc2101 . My heart aches when people call children naughty, ignorant, rude, and all fancy labels, without even understanding that the child doesn’t even understand the meaning of all these labels. Children are the product of their environment, so it’s never the child who needs to be fixed; the environment needs to be distilled.

6 Likes

@Ramya, so true… labels are often the adult’s frustration, not the child’s reality.

A child is always communicating something, discomfort, overwhelm, confusion, unmet need, but since they don’t yet have language for emotions, it comes out as behaviour. When we name the child instead of understanding the message, the behaviour gets suppressed but the feeling stays unheard.

Your line about the environment needing to be distilled has touched me deeply.
Many times healing begins not by correcting the child, but by making the space around them safer, calmer and more accepting. Once the child feels seen, the behaviour usually reorganises on its own.:heart::heart:

5 Likes

@Harmeet, absolutely…..change in these patterns is rarely loud, it’s usually quiet and generational.

Most of our parents didn’t consciously create these roles, they simply passed forward what safety looked like in their time. Now we’re becoming aware of it and instead of blaming the past, we’re softening the future. That’s probably the most meaningful part of this work.

And I agree, the real impact shows up in how we raise children differently. When a child doesn’t have to earn love, they grow into an adult who doesn’t negotiate for belonging.

Slow, subtle, but deeply powerful change :slightly_smiling_face::heart::growing_heart:

4 Likes

When u r burdend under the expectations may be invisible one, u start revolving around them.u loose youself in this process

3 Likes